The meaning of the verse itself is clear. It contains an order in the
form of threat to the Messenger (s.a.w.a.) to convey the message, and
promises to protect him from the people. If we ponder on the verse looking
at the position it has been placed in, and look at the verses preceding
and following it, you will see them exposing the condition of the People
of the Book and admonishing and condemning them for their various transgressions,
their crossing the limit and indulging in things prohibited by Allah
and their rejection of divine communications. For example, the preceding
verse says: And if they had kept up the Tawrat and the Injil and that
which was revealed to them from their Lord, they would certainly have
eaten from above them and from beneath their feet; ... ; and the following
one says: Say: "0 People of the Book! You have no ground to stand
upon until you keep up the Tawrat and the Injil and that which is revealed
to you from your Lord; ". . .
Then ponder on the verse itself and see how its clauses are inter linked
together. Now, you will be astonished, [and realize that this verse
is not connected with the preceding or following verses].
Had this verse been connected to the preceding and following verses
which deal with the People of the Book, it would have meant that the
Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was ordered in extremely harsh words to deliver what
Allah had revealed regarding the People of the Book; and the context
would show that: what has been revealed to you from your Lord refers
to what he was told to convey in the immediately following verse: Say:
"0 People of the Book! You have no ground to stand upon until you
keep up the Tawrat and the Injil and that which is revealed to you from
your Lord; ". . .
But the context of the verse itself rejects this interpretation. The
clause: and Allah will protect you from the people, shows that the revealed
order which the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) is urged to convey is a very important
one; the delivery of which would put the life of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.)
in peril or would cause the divine religion to fail in its aim. But
the Jews or the Christians did not have such a power during the days
of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) as to put his life in danger to such an extent
as to justify holding back or delaying its conveyance, until Allah gives
him a promise to protect him from the people if he conveys the revealed
order. Even in the early days of the Prophet's hijrah to Medina the
People of the Book were not in a position to put his life in danger,
although the Jews were fiercely opposed to him and their active opposition
ultimately led to the battle of Khaybar, etc.
Moreover, this verse does not contain any tough order or any vehement
word. The Prophet had delivered before that the verses, which were harder,
sharper and much bitter than it for the Jews. Also, before that he was
told to convey to the unbelievers of the Quraysh and the polytheists
of Arabia what was more distasteful than it, e.g. the message of Tawhid
(Oneness of God) and the rebuttal of idol worship. Besides, those people
were more ruthless, more violent and more given to bloodshed than the
Jews and other People of the Book. Hence, Allah did not use any threatening
word when ordering him to convey His message, nor did He find it necessary
to give him assurance of His protection.
Apart from that, the verses describing the condition of the People
of the Book constitute the major part of the chapter, "The Table".
Therefore, this verse was certainly revealed in it; and at the time
this chapter was revealed, the Jews' power was already broken, their
fire had died down, and they were engulfed by the divine curse and wrath.
Whenever they kindled a fire for war, Allah put it out. In this background,
there was no reason for the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) to fear them
regarding the divine religion. They had already entered through peace
treaties in the domain of Islam and they, as well as the Christians,
had agreed to pay jizyah. How could Allah talk, in this environment,
about the Messenger's fear and worry in delivering the divine message
to them; while he had conveyed to them messages which were much harder,
and stood before them in surroundings which were more frightful and
more weird.
Thus, there is no room for any doubt that this verse is totally separate
in its context from that of the preceding and following verses; and
has no connection with them. In short, it is a single verse, which was
revealed alone.
The verse speaks about an order which was sent to the Prophet (s.a.w.a.)
the entire religion or some parts of it and the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was
afraid of the people in delivering that message and kept postponing
it waiting for a suitable time. If there were no fear and no delaying
there was no reason why he should be addressed in such a threatening
way: and if you do it not, then you have not delivered His message.
Compare it with the verses revealed in early period of the Call none
of which has any shade of threat. For example: Read in the name of thy
Lord Who created... (to the end of ch.96); 0 you who are enwrapped,
arise and warn (74:1 2); ... therefore, follow the right way to Him
and ask His forgiveness; and woe to the polytheists (41:6), apart from
other such verses.
No doubt, the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was afraid of the people, but he was
not afraid of sacrificing his life in the cause of Allah, because his
whole life and character is a rebuttal of such thinking. Moreover, Allah
Himself testifies about His Messengers that they did not fear the adversaries.
For example: There is no harm in the Prophet doing that which Allah
has ordained for him; such has been the course of Allah with respect
to those who have gone before; and the command of Allah is a decree
that is made absolute. Those who deliver the message of Allah and fear
Him, and do not fear any one hut Allah; and Allah is sufficient to take
account (33:38 39). Also, Allah has said concerning such situations:
... so do not fear them, and fear Me if you are believers (3:175). And
He has praised a group of believers that they were not afraid of the
people although the people had tried to frighten them: Those to whom
the people said "Surely men have gathered against you, therefore
fear them "; but this (only) increased their faith, and they said
"Allah is sufficient for us and most excellent Protector is (He).
" So they returned with favor from Allah and (His) grace; no evil
touched them and they followed the pleasure of Allah; and Allah is the
Lord of mighty grace (3:173 4).
Also, it is not possible to say that the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was afraid
for his life because if he were killed the divine mission was bound
to perish, and for this reason he was delaying its conveyance waiting
for a suitable time. But this hypothesis is patently false, because
Allah says: You have no concern in the affair ... (3:128); and if they
had killed the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) Allah had power to revive His mission
through any means He pleased and any cause He wished.
Of course, it is possible to infer from the clause: and Allah will
protect you from the people, that the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was afraid
of the people concerning the delivery that they would accuse him [of
having selfish motive], which would irreparably damage the whole fabric
of conveyance. He had permission from Allah to use his discretion in
such matters, and it had no connection with any fear regarding his own
self.
The above description makes it clear that the verse was not revealed
in the early days of prophethood, as some exegetes have thought; as
in that case there would be no sense in the clause: and Allah will protect
you from the people; because such an interpretation would imply that
Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was delaying the delivery of the divine message because
he was afraid that they would kill him and it would cost him his life,
or would nullify the effects of tabligh. But such a hypothesis is not
tenable.
Again, let us see what is the connotation of the phrase: what has been
revealed to you from your Lord. Does it mean the whole religion? If
so, then the clauses: and if you do it not, then you have not delivered
His message, would mean: 0 Messenger! Deliver the religion, and if you
do not deliver the religion, then you did not deliver the religion!
Someone has said: The verse means: If you do not deliver the message,
then you will be liable to blame for dereliction of duty and negligence
of what Allah had most emphatically commanded you to do and it is in
the same vein as the well known Arab poet, Abu 'n-Najm, has said: I'm
Abu 'n Najm, and my poem is my poem.
But this explanation is wrong; such rhetorical expressions are used
regarding the general and the particular, or the unrestricted and the
restricted, and such expressions allude that the both are one and the
same; as Abu 'n Najm says that my poem is my poem, i.e., no one should
think that my talent has now dulled, or vicissitudes of time have adversely
affected my genius and robbed me of the gift of poetry; because the
poem which I compose today has the same brilliance which my poems had
in the past.
However, this explanation cannot be applied to the divine speech: and
if you do it not, then you have not delivered His message. Because if
it is believed that the verse was revealed in early days of prophethood,
then the message the religion in its totality or the basic religion
was a single unit, not changeable or alterable. Then how can it be said
that if you did not deliver this message then you did not deliver that
message of the basic messages; admittedly in the beginning it was the
basic message that was a collection of religious cognition.
It is now clear that the verse could not have been revealed in the
early period of prophethood, nor can the phrase: what has been revealed
to you from your Lord, point to the basic religion or totality of religion
either in the early days or at any later period; because all such interpretations
would render the clause: and if you do it not then you have not delivered
His message, devoid of meaning and irrelevant.
We should reiterate here that: If message were to refer to the basic
or total religion, then the words: 0 Messenger! Deliver what has been
revealed to you from your Lord, could not have been revealed except
in the early days of prophethood, as is clear; And the problem would
remain as before, that the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was afraid of the people
in delivering the divine message.
Apparently, the matter which was revealed to the Prophet (s.a.w.a.)
and this verse put emphasis on its delivery was not the religion in
its totality, or basic religion whatever meaning is understood from
it. Therefore, we have to admit that it was a part of religion. The
meaning in this case will be as follows: 0 Messenger! Deliver the particular
command revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do it not, then you
have not delivered Allah's message at all. According to this interpretation,
"His message" means all the things that the Messenger of Allah
(s.a.w.a.) had brought as part of religion. Otherwise, the previous
trouble that the speech would be devoid of meaning - would continue.
Let us put it in this way: If "His message" means this particular
order, it would means: 'Deliver this order, and if you did it not, you
did not deliver this message!' It is clearly absurd.
The verse therefore means: '0 Messenger! Deliver this particular command,
and if you do it not, then you have not delivered the basic message
or the message in its totality.' This meaning is correct and understandable
and then the speech will be in the style of the poem of Abu'n Najm:
I'm Abu 'n Najm, and my poem is poem.
Why was this order so important that if it was not conveyed then the
message was not conveyed at all? It was because religion's knowledge
and commands are inter linked, inter twined with one another on all
sides; if one coil is unraveled, the whole material is destructed especially
in the sphere of delivery because each item is connected with all others.
This supposition has no defect in itself, yet the clauses coming after
it: and Allah will protect you from the people; surely Allah will not
guide the unbelieving people, do not fit on it. These clauses clearly
show that some unbelieving people had decided to oppose this revealed
command, or, seeing their tendency, they were expected to oppose it
to the extreme. They would use every strategy to nullify this divine
mission and neutralize it, so that it could not bring about any effect
or benefit. Therefore, Allah promised His Messenger that He would protect
him from them, nullify their artifice and leave them wandering in their
own viles.
This meaning does not fit on any revealed order whatsoever; because
the religious cognition and orders in Islam are not all of them of the
same importance, some are the pillars of religion, others are like the
invocation on sighting the crescent, there is prohibition of adultery
and that of looking at a stranger woman. The fear that the Prophet (s.a.w.a.)
had and for which Allah promised him His protection, cannot be related
to every such order; obviously it had emanated from some especial commandment.
The fact, that if this commandment was not conveyed, then no other
order was conveyed, shows its utmost importance, and makes it crystal
clear that this particular order occupies such a central position in
the whole structure that if it was left unannounced, it would amount
to leaving all other orders unannounced, because its relation to other
items is like that of soul with body; if it is disconnected, there would
remain only a dead body, devoid of feeling, movement [and perception,
etc.]. The verse thus proves that Allah had sent to his Messenger (s.a.w.a.)
an order which was to complete the religion, and by which the religion
would firmly settle in its proper pedestal. As such there was a danger
that the people would oppose it and strive hard to overturn it against
the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) aiming at demolishing the structure of religion
he had built and disintegrating all its parts. The Prophet (s.a. w.a.),
having intuitive knowledge of the people's nature, understood their
tendency and was afraid that they would contrive to neutralize all his
endeavors. Accordingly, he kept postponing its delivery from time to
time, waiting for a suitable circumstances and peaceful atmosphere,
in order that his mission might be successful and his endeavors fruitful.
But Allah ordered him to make haste in conveying that message, showing
to him its importance, and promising to protect him from the people.
In this way, He assured him that He would not let their plans succeed,
nor would they be able to overturn his Mission's affairs.
Overturning the Prophetic Mission and negating his efforts after the
spread of Islam was not possible for the polytheists and idol worshippers
of Arabia or outside. In other words, it is not possible to suppose
that the verse was revealed in Mecca before hijrah, and the Prophet
(s.a.w.a.) was afraid that the people would slander and accuse him of
lying in his affairs, as Allah quotes their calumnies in the Qur'an:
"One taught (by others), a madman" (44:14); "A poet,
we wait for him the evil accidents of time" (52:30); "A magician
or a mad man " (51:52); "You follow only a man deprived of
reason " (17:47); "This is not but enchantment, narrated"
(74:24); "The stories of the ancients he has got them written so
these are read out to him morning and evening" (25:5); "Only
a mortal teaches him. . ", (16: 103); "Go and steadily adhere
to your gods, this is most surely a thing sought after" (38:6);
and other such things which they used to say about him (s.a.w.a.). However,
such talks could not shake the foundation of religion. They only show
if they show anything the confusion and perturbation in their ideas
and their crookedness. Moreover, such slanders were not reserved for
the Prophet (s.a.w.a.), so that he would be disturbed because of them
or afraid of their appearance; in fact all the messengers and prophets
were equally made targets of such afflictions and misfortunes; they
all had to face such unpalatable situations from their people, as Allah
has described in the stories of Nuh and the succeeding prophets who
are mentioned in the Qur'an.
If there was something like that and there must have been it could
be imagined after the hijrah when the religion was firmly established
in the Islamic society. The Muslims were then a mixed lot: There were
good believers, and there were the hypocrites who were powerful and
could not be under rated. Lastly there were those whose hearts were
diseased whom the Mighty Book calls "the listeners". These
people dealt with the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) although they believed in him
really or apparently like the kings are dealt with; and the divine religion
in their eyes was not different from man made national laws. All this
may be seen in various sets of Qur'anic verses; and some of them have
already been explained in previous volumes of this book.
In this background, it could possibly happen that delivery of some
orders which could apparently give some advantage to the Prophet (s.a.w.a.),
could generate a misconception in those people's minds that he is a
king in the guise of prophethood, and his shariah is the worldly law
disguised as religion; as we find its evidence in some people's talk
on various occasions.
If this or similar doubt had entered into their hearts, it would have
generated such corruption and perversion in religion which no power
on earth could rectify or anyone could remove. Obviously, this revealed
order which the Prophet had to deliver was of such a nature that people
could think of it to be especially benefiting the Prophet (s.a.w.a.),
and that it was particularly reserved to him without any Muslim having
any part in it, like the story of Zayd, and plurality of marriages and
the one fifth of the war booty, etc.
However, the especial rules, if not affecting general Muslims, were
not expected to create doubts in minds. For examples, permission of
marriage with a woman divorced by an adopted son was not particularly
reserved to him. Likewise, if marrying more than four wives were based
on his own desire without permission of Allah, there was nothing to prevent
him from allowing it to all Muslims. His life long conduct of giving
preference to Muslims over his own self in division of wealth, etc.
which came into his hands leaves no room for any doubt in such affairs.
All the above elaboration makes it clear that the verse speaks about
a revealed order that could create a misunderstanding that it contains
a sort of personal benefit and interest for the Prophet (s.a.w.a.),
and gives him a privilege, which the others too would have desired;
and its delivery and enforcement would deprive them of its enjoyment.
That is why the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was afraid of its delivery. But Allah
ordered him to convey it and put utmost emphasis on this delivery, and
promised to protect him from the people, telling him that his adversaries
will not succeed in their machination, even if they tried.
This supports the traditions, narrated by both sects, that the verse
was revealed about the guardianship of 'Ali (a.s.); that Allah had sent
direction to convey this commandment, but the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) was
afraid that the people would accuse him regarding his cousin; that was
why he kept postponing its delivery until this verse was sent down;
and he delivered it at Ghadir Khumm, and announced: "He whose mawla
(Guardian) am I, this 'Ali is his mawla."
The essentiality of the Guardianship of the affairs of the ummah for
religion is clear without any doubt. Islam is a religion so comprehensive
and all encompassing that it has laid down for the whole the people
in all regions and for all times all fundamental gnosis, ethical principles
and practical rules which cover all human movement and stillness, separately
and collectively, contrary to other general legal systems. How can it
be imagined that such a comprehensive system does not need a guardian
who should protect and preserve it properly. Or, can it be said that
of all the human societies, only the Muslim ummah and Islamic society
is so self sufficient that it does not need any ruler to manage its
affairs and look after its interests. What excuse can be offered to
a research scholar who looks at the social system established by the
Prophet (s.a.w.a.) and finds that whenever he went out of Medina, he
invariably always put a man in his place to manage the society. He had
appointed 'Ali in his place in Medina at the time of going forth to
Tabuk; 'Ali said: "0 Messenger of Allah! Are you leaving me among
the women and children?" The Prophet (s.a.w.a.) said: "Well,
are you not pleased that you should be to me as Harun was to Musa, except
that there is no prophet after me?"
And the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) used to appoint governors in all towns,
which were in the hands of the Muslims, e.g., Mecca, Taif and Yemen,
etc. Likewise, he appointed people at the head of expeditions and battalions,
which he used to send around. And what difference is there between his
lifetime and after his death? Rather the essentiality of such appointment
is more emphatic for the time after his departure from this world; and
the need of such a ruler at that time is more and more pressing.
Allah's saying: 0 Messenger! Deliver what has been revealed to you
from your Lord:
The order is addressed to the Messenger, as it is the most appropriate
attribute to the conveying the divine order, which was revealed. It
is a sort of proof that the delivery mentioned in the verse is obligatory
and compulsory; because the only function of a messenger is to convey
the message he is entrusted with. In other words, the office of Messengership
obligates him to deliver the message.
The verse does not elaborate what was revealed to him from his Lord.
It alludes to it just as a thing revealed to him. This vagueness points
to the greatness of that message, and shows that the Messenger of Allah
(s.a.w.a.) had no hand in it, nor did he have any authority in his own
affairs. It would be another proof that he (s.a.w.a.) had no power or
discretion to keep the order secret and postpone its conveyance from
this time to that. It also provided him with an excuse that he had been
obligated to deliver this order; and showed that he was perfectly justified
in fearing the people in this respect; but at the same time indicated
that this important order had to be announced by him, in his own words,
through his own tongue.
Allah's saying: and if you do it not, then you have not delivered his
message:
Some reciters have read, "his messages" in plural. In any
case, it means the totality of the messages that was sent by Allah to
His Messenger (s.a.w.a.). We have explained above that this clause shows
the utmost importance of the order alluded to; and that it enjoyed such
a dignity and position that if it was not conveyed then it would be
as if no message was ever delivered by him.
The speech is constructed as a threat; and in reality it connotes the
importance of the order if this one order was not conveyed to the people
and its implications were not preserved, it would be as though no other
part of religion was ever conveyed.
It is a conditional sentence, to show the importance of the conditional
clause; that its subordinate clause depends totally on the principle
one for its existence.
This conditional sentence is not like such sentences found in our speech.
We use conditional sentences because we do not know whether the principle
clause would lake place, bringing about with it the subordinate clause.
But far be it from the position of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) that the Qur'an
should imply that it was not sure whether the Prophet would convey or
not the revealed message. And Allah says: Allah best knows where He
places His message (6:124).
In short, this sentence apparently contains a threat, but in fact it
makes it known to the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) and other people the utmost
importance of the order and that the Messenger had no power to delay
its delivery.
Allah's saying: and Allah will protect you from the people; surely
Allah will not guide the unbelieving people:
ar Raghib has said: "al 'Asm means to take hold; and al i'tisam
is to adhere. al-'Isam is strap, that which is used for binding; the
prophets enjoy 'ismah i.e. Allah protects them, first through the pure
nature which is reserved for them; then through the physical and psychological
virtues which He has bestowed upon them. Then through helping them and
keeping their feet firm [on righteousness]; then by sending tranquility
upon them and protecting their hearts, and finally through tawfiq (=
divine help); Allah says: "and Allah will protect you from the
people". And al 'ismah is like bracelet, and al-mi'sam is wrist,
the part of hand where it is worn; the wrist's whiteness is called 'ismah,
likening it to bracelet, as the whiteness of foot is called tahjil (wearing
anklet); in the same vein they say, a'sam (white footed) crow [i.e.
rare]."
Allamah Tabataba'I says: The explanation given above of the prophets'
'ismah is good, there is no objection to it; but those meanings cannot
be applied to the verse under discussion: and Allah will protect you
from the people; if we were to apply it, it may be applied to the verse:
... and they shall not harm you in any way, and Allah has revealed to
you the Book and the Wisdom, and He has taught you what you did not
know, and Allah's grace on you is very great (4:113). As for the clause:
and Allah will protect you from the people, the verb, ya'sim, in it
apparently denotes protection and safety from the people's evil which
they aimed at the noble person of the Prophet, or his religious objectives
or at the success of his Call and the triumph of his endeavors in short,
any connotation appropriate to his sacred office.
However, looking at the usage of this word, we find that it actually
means holding fast and clutching. Therefore, its use in the meaning
of protection is based on allusion, because protection necessitates
holding it fast.
Protection from the people is unrestricted and general. It does not
say from which type of machination of the people the Prophet shall be
protected. Does it point to their transgression and endeavors to harm
him in body, like murder, poisoning, or assassination? Or through speech,
like abusing and slandering? Or through some other devices, like disrupting
his affairs one way or another through treachery, deception and double
dealing? In short this non identification of things protected against,
implies a sort of generalization; yet the context confines it to their
evil that could have disrupted and destroyed what he had built and raised
of the structure of religion.
"The people" refers to all human beings, without looking
at any specialty, be it natural and in field of creation, like masculinity
and femininity, or otherwise, like knowledge, virtues, and richness,
etc. That is why it is seldom used for other than a group; and for this
very reason, it often points to virtuous human beings if the virtue
spoken of has some relation with humanity, as Allah says: And when it
is said to them: "Believe as the people have believed" [2:13]
i.e. those in whom meaning of humanity is found, and it is by which
truth is perceived and distinguished from falsity.
Also, sometimes it denotes a sort of vileness and downfall in circumstances.
This happens when the subject of talk is a thing in which some such
human virtues are contemplated which are extraneous to the basic theme
of the species, as Allah says: ... but most people do not know (30:30).
Or, as you may say: Don't put trust in the people's promises; or, don't
seek help from their masses. In the above clauses, you want to express
the idea that trust or appeal to help should be placed in virtuous people
who have natural disposition to fulfill their undertakings and to remain
firm on their stand; that you should not trust such people who are merely
called humans, without any praise or blame being attached to them; [especially]
when the main theme does not indicate any merit or demerit other than
the basic meaning of humanity, as Allah says: 0 you people! Surely We
have created you of a male and a female and made you nations and tribes
that you may recognize each other; surely the most honorable of you
with Allah is the one who is most pious;
(49:13).
Probably, the word: "the people", in the clause: "and
Allah will protect you from the people", points to the multitude
of people which encompasses believers and hypocrites and those whose
hearts are diseased; all of them are mixed together without any distinction.
Therefore, if there is a cause to fear them, all of them combined will
be feared. Probably the clause: "surely Allah will not guide the
unbelieving people," points to it. This clause explains the reason
of the preceding one: "and Allah will protect you from the people";
it has been described earlier that the verse was revealed after hijrah
when the Islam had gained upper hand in Arabia, and most of the people
had apparently entered into the fold of Islam, although there were among
them the hypocrites and those whose hearts were diseased. Therefore,
the phrase: "unbelieving people" denotes those who were mingled
with the general public, who were not called "unbelievers"
yet the characteristics of disbelief had taken root in their hearts.
And through this clause, Allah has given assurance that He will nullify
their machinations and protect His Messenger from their evil.
Also, it seems clear that in this clause, disbelief, means disbelieving
in one of the commandments of Allah, i.e. the order to which the phrase:
what has been revealed to you from your Lord, points; it is the same
style that has been used in the verse of Hajj: ... and whoever disbelieves,
then surely Allah is Self sufficient (independent) of the worlds (3:97).
In any case, the context of the verse does not allow taking "disbelief"
in the meaning of rejection of the two testimonies. Such views can only
be considered if we take: what has been revealed to you from your Lord,
as referring to the sum total of all the revealed messages, but you
have seen that this interpretation has no leg to stand upon.
The statement that Allah will not guide the disbelievers, means that
He will not guide them in their treachery and machinations, and will
prevent usual causes to submit to them when they proceed to their objectives
of evil and mischief. It is like the verses: ... surely Allah does not
guide the transgressing people (63:6); ... and Allah does not guide
aright the unjust people (2:258). Detailed discussion on this subject
may be seen in volume two of this book.
It is certainly not correct to say that the non guidance here means
not guiding them to correct faith, because it goes against the basic
concept of Divine Call. How can Allah tell His Messenger: You call them
to Allah, or, invite them to obey the divine command, but I will not
guide them to it, except for the purpose of completing the proof against
them!
Moreover, we see with our own eyes that Allah guides a lot of unbelievers
to faith, and continues to do so every day; and He Himself has said:
... and Allah guides whom He pleases to the straight path (2:213).
Now, it is crystal clear that not guiding the unbelievers means that
Allah does not let them achieve their goal of negating the word of truth
and extinguishing the light of the revealed commandments. The unbelievers
as well as the unjust people and the transgressors, under the influence
of their sinister minds and erroneous views, want to change the custom
of Allah, which encompasses the whole creation. They intend to divert
the proceedings of true causes (which are free from stigma of disobeying
the Lord of the universe) towards their own false goals and wicked destinations.
But their formal powers can never debilitate Almighty Lord. Let them
ponder on this question. Who has put these powers in their body? The
only answer is: Allah. [How can these powers overpower their Creator?]
They might occasionally succeed in their endeavors and obtain for a
short time what they want, but soon all this is turned upside down and
their trickery turns against themselves: ... and the evil plan does
not beset any save the authors of it ... (35:43); ... thus does Allah
compare truth and falsehood; then as for the scum, it passes away as
a worthless thing; and as for that which profits the people, it remains
in the earth; thus does Allah set forth parables (13:17)
Accordingly, the clause: "surely Allah will not guide the unbelieving
people", elaborates the preceding one: "and Allah will protect
you from the people", putting some limitation on its generality.
The protection then means that Allah will protect him (s.a.w.a.) so
that the people do not inflict any harm on him before he achieves his
objectives of delivering this order and announcing it to the ummah.
For example, He will not let them kill him before he conveys the message;
they would not be able to rise against him or overturn his affairs,
or accuse him of such matters which would make the believers go out
of his religion, or affect such devices which would destroy and annihilate
this shari'ah. Nay, Allah will certainly make the word of truth victorious,
and establish the religion as He pleases, wherever He pleases and whenever
He pleases. Allah says: If He pleases, He can make you pass away, 0
people! And bring others; and Allah has the power to do this (4:133).
However, the verse: "and Allah will protect you from the people",
cannot be taken to imply a general and all encompassing protection from
all and every trouble and harm; because such a view is rebutted by the
Qur'an, the hadi th and accepted history. The Prophet (s.a.w.a.) had
to suffer from his people be they believers, unbelievers or hypocrites
such misfortunes, tribulations and multifarious afflictions and grievances
which nobody could ever bear except the noble Prophet (s.a.w.a.); and
he has said in a famous hadith: "No prophet was ever harmed like
I have been."